Search results for "Electronic patient-reported outcome"

showing 2 items of 2 documents

Validity of five foot and ankle specific electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) instruments in patients undergoing elective orthopedic foot or an…

2019

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROS) are widely accepted measures for evaluating outcomes of surgical interventions. As patient-reported information is stored in electronic health records, it is essential that there are valid electronic PRO (ePRO) instruments available for clinicians and researchers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of electronic versions of five widely used foot and ankle specific PRO instruments. Methods: Altogether 111 consecutive elective foot/ankle surgery patients were invited face-to-face to participate in this study. Patients completed electronic versions of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS),…

MalepsychometricsVisual Analog Scaleclinimetricsleikkaushoito0302 clinical medicineSurveys and QuestionnairesElectronic Health RecordsOrthopedics and Sports MedicinePatient-reported outcomevalidation030222 orthopedicsMiddle AgedElectronic patient-reported outcomePRO MEASURES3. Good healthpsykometriikkamedicine.anatomical_structureConvergent validityvalidointiFemalePatient-reported outcomeEQUIVALENCEFoot (unit)medicine.medical_specialtyPsychometricsVisual analogue scaleQUESTIONNAIREpatient-reported outcomeVALIDATIONANALOG SCALE FOOTePRO03 medical and health sciencesClinimetricsanklemedicineQUALITYCOSMINHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresFootbusiness.industryReproducibility of ResultsConstruct validity030229 sport sciences3126 Surgery anesthesiology intensive care radiologyjalatSurgerySYSTEMATIC REVIEWSnilkathoitotuloksetfootOrthopedic surgeryPAPERAnkleAnklebusinessAnkle JointTASK-FORCEFoot and Ankle Surgery
researchProduct

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Evaluating Cancer Symptoms: A Systematic Review.

2021

Abstract Objectives This systematic review aims to evaluate the psychometric properties and the methodologic quality of studies describing smartphone-, tablet- or computer-based questionnaires for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) evaluating symptoms in oncology and hematology patients. Data Sources A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Cinahl, Cuiden, Lilacs, and PsycINFO. Criteria for inclusion were (i) primary studies evaluating scales for symptoms assessment, (ii) developed in adult population (>18 years) with an oncology or hematology malignancy diagnosis, (iii) validations tested via phone or computer, and (iv) describing at least one psychometric prope…

Adultmedicine.medical_specialtyPsychometricsPsychometricsOncology (nursing)business.industryConstruct validityReproducibility of ResultsCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse EventsPsycINFOCINAHLElectronic patient-reported outcomeChecklist03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicine030220 oncology & carcinogenesisNeoplasmsmedicineContent validityHumansMedical physics030212 general & internal medicinePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresElectronicsbusinessSeminars in oncology nursing
researchProduct